<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
    <title></title>
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
    I like that you brought up the age difference, I do think that is
    valid in many areas. As a 30 year old who knows more about Hentai
    film than I care to admit I think for me it's more of a
    professionalism and "quality" thing over offensive. I just think
    it's stupid and lends itself to the invalid-ness that Wikipedia is
    trying to shake off. <br>
    <br>
    Other wiki's like Encyclopedia Dramatica thrive on cartoons and
    obnoxious tacky stuff (yeah ok, Pedobear is funny, but...) to
    represent it. I don't need my scholarly labor and research to be
    associated with that crap.<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <br>
    On 2/3/2011 4:57 PM, Nepenthe wrote:
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:AANLkTi=rB-Lxi_u97wKzL_PeTQSf7riXQ7-S+DDaApwq@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">I wonder if Wikipe-tan is more of a generational issue
      than a gender one. I'm pretty much as humorless feminist as they
      come, but being in my early 20s, I grew up with anime and
      Wikipe-tan is no more disturbing to me in the Wikipedia context
      than if we had come up with a Disney-style mascot not wearing
      pants. (Granted, that OS-tans are pretty universally female is
      undoubtedly a gender issue and the anime style is a legitimate
      concern as well, but I think it's part of culture at large, not
      one that Wikimedia can really address.)<br>
      <br>
      I guess my point is that it might be a wash whether Wikipe-tan
      drives off more older editors who find her offensive than she
      attracts younger editors who find her friendly and familiar. It's
      really a side point though. It never occurred to me that
      Wikipe-tan might be considered embarrassing or inappropriate and
      I'm finding this conversation eye-opening. <br>
      <br>
      Nepenthe<br>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Steven
        Walling <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:swalling@wikimedia.org">swalling@wikimedia.org</a>&gt;</span>
        wrote:<br>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt
          0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
          padding-left: 1ex;">
          <div style="word-wrap: break-word;">
            <div>
              <div class="h5">
                <div>On Feb 3, 2011, at 12:40 PM, Daniel and Elizabeth
                  Case wrote:</div>
              </div>
            </div>
            <div>
              <div>
                <div class="h5">
                  <div><br>
                    <blockquote type="cite">
                      <div><br>
                        <br>
                        <br>
                        <blockquote type="cite">On Wednesday, February
                          02, 2011, <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="mailto:jidanni@jidanni.org"
                            target="_blank">jidanni@jidanni.org</a>
                          wrote:<br>
                        </blockquote>
                        <blockquote type="cite">
                          <blockquote type="cite">
                            K&gt; our "mascot"? An overtly sexualized,
                            large-breasted woman who people<br>
                          </blockquote>
                        </blockquote>
                        <blockquote type="cite">
                          <blockquote type="cite">K&gt; regularly draw
                            in bikinis and maid costumes? I mean, I know<br>
                          </blockquote>
                        </blockquote>
                        <blockquote type="cite">
                          <blockquote type="cite">K&gt; Wikipe-tan is
                            not actually The Problem. But she's the most
                            egregious<br>
                          </blockquote>
                        </blockquote>
                        <blockquote type="cite">
                          <blockquote type="cite">
                            K&gt; example I think we have of the sort of
                            unconscious "boyzone" culture<br>
                          </blockquote>
                        </blockquote>
                        <blockquote type="cite">
                          <blockquote type="cite"><br>
                          </blockquote>
                        </blockquote>
                        <blockquote type="cite">
                          <blockquote type="cite">
                            Ah, <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                              href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipe-tan"
                              target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipe-tan</a>
                            .<br>
                          </blockquote>
                        </blockquote>
                        <blockquote type="cite"><br>
                        </blockquote>
                        <blockquote type="cite">
                          I had never seen that, and now that I have I
                          find it embarrassing for <br>
                        </blockquote>
                        <blockquote type="cite">Wikipedia.<br>
                        </blockquote>
                        <br>
                        IIRC Wikipe-tan was only originally meant to be
                        the mascot for WikiProject <br>
                        Anime and Manga; how she became the avatar for
                        the project as a whole, I <br>
                        don't know. She's hardly an inclusive or
                        representative figure (I'm not a <br>
                        anime/manga otaku, aside from the other issues)
                        and we can certainly do <br>
                        better.<br>
                        <br>
                        My own personal notes on signs of a "boyzone"
                        culture at Wikipedia: the <br>
                        appearance of [[Lindsay Lohan]], [[Reese
                        Witherspoon]] and [[Uma Thurman]] <br>
                        as Main Page FAs within a two-year timespan. And
                        also the one FA that Raul <br>
                        quite sensibly (IMO) has decided will never be
                        on the Main Page.<br>
                        <br>
                        In the same category, there's also the
                        discussion from the top of <br>
                        [[Talk:KaDee Strickland]] downwards, that ensued
                        after that article was on <br>
                        the Main Page. It's hard for me not to see some
                        of it as misogynistic ...<br>
                        <br>
                        Daniel Case <br>
                        <br>
                        <br>
                        <br>
                        _______________________________________________<br>
                        Gendergap mailing list<br>
                        <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="mailto:Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org"
                          target="_blank">Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br>
                        <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap"
                          target="_blank">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap</a><br>
                      </div>
                    </blockquote>
                  </div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
              <div>The whole Wikipe-tan issue isn't limited to Wikipedia
                itself either. I participate regularly in the Featured
                Picture process on Wikimedia Commons, and have lately
                been struggling against media in a similar vein.[1]</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>There is a substantial editorial debate&nbsp;&nbsp;around fan
                art like this&nbsp;that is in flux on Commons. On the one
                hand, it's relatively easy to make the argument that
                they're not educational media. However, you still get
                people who in all seriousness support promotion of media
                like this with comments such as, "I like her big tits."
                (That's one extreme example, but it's still a direct
                quote.)</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Additional voices would be welcome, especially since
                Commons is a much smaller community. I think perhaps one
                of our first commitments should be to filling the
                informal leadership gap others have mentioned by
                stepping up and saying what we find to be
                unacceptable.[2]</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>1.&nbsp;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anime_Girl.svg"
                  target="_blank">http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anime_Girl.svg</a></div>
              2. This talk was humorous, but I think there's some truth
              in the slide:&nbsp;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Steven_Walling_Wikipedia_mascots_-_Ignite_Portland_8_-_Portland_Oregon.jpg"
                target="_blank">http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Steven_Walling_Wikipedia_mascots_-_Ignite_Portland_8_-_Portland_Oregon.jpg</a></div>
            <div><br>
              <font color="#888888">
                <div>
                  <div style="word-wrap: break-word;">
                    <div style="word-wrap: break-word;">
                      <div>Steven Walling</div>
                      <div>Fellow at the Wikimedia Foundation<br>
                        <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="http://wikimediafoundation.org/"
                          target="_blank">wikimediafoundation.org</a></div>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <br>
                  </div>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                </div>
                <br>
              </font></div>
          </div>
          <br>
          _______________________________________________<br>
          Gendergap mailing list<br>
          <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org">Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br>
          <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap"
            target="_blank">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap</a><br>
          <br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org">Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
      <div><span style="color: rgb(39, 153, 128);">Sarah Stierch
          Consulting</span></div>
      <div><span style="color: rgb(39, 153, 128);">Historical, cultural
          &amp; artistic research, advising &amp; event planning.</span></div>
      <div><span style="color: rgb(39, 153, 128);">------------------------------------------------------</span></div>
      <div><a href="http://www.sarahstierch.com" style="color: rgb(39,
          153, 128);">http://www.sarahstierch.com/</a></div>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>