On 5/13/13 5:03 PM, Pete Forsyth wrote:
That image should be tagged with {{consent|published}}, which
states the following:
" This media was copied from the source indicated, which adheres
to professional editorial standards, allowing the status of
consent to be reasonably inferred."
Thus there is no reason it should be deleted. There are several
such options available with the consent template.
This certainly seems like an improvement to me (in terms of due
diligence and providing the reader with useful information) -- but how
does it address the image's compatibility with the board resolution?
It remains true that all 5 people were in a private setting, and did
not (to our knowledge) express their consent to be published on
Wikimedia Commons. (Or perhaps mere "consent to be published" is what
the board meant - ?)
That's a good point. I wonder if it would be useful to circle back
around with the Board and see if they would be interested in a more
realistic "baby-steps" approach to the issue of consent.
Ryan Kaldari