[Gendergap] Please, a question on deleted article SP "Migrantas" on women´s empowermente

[patricia morales]

Dear,
I would like to draw your attention to the history of article "migrantas" an initiative in Berlin on the empowerment of migrant women, that was deleted by the concept autopromotion and later by the attribution of irrelevance.Men and women worked for improving it but it seems without results.It would be good to have some suggestions on that.best regards,
Patricia

--- On Tue, 5/17/11, Sarah Stierch <sarah at sarahstierch.com> wrote:

From: Sarah Stierch <sarah at sarahstierch.com>
Subject: Re: [Gendergap] [Commons-l] Fwd: Photo of the Day on Wikimedia Commons
To: gendergap at lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Tuesday, May 17, 2011, 8:19 AM



  

    
  
  
    Hi dz,

    

    Great to hear you'd like to be involved. I've been really
    busy the past few weeks with finishing school, a trip to California,
    and GLAM related activities (oh and Regional Ambassadorness!) - so I
    haven't had time to sit down and get my "stuff together" for the
    HOW-TO. But, I'd love to add you to our HOW-TO gang if you like.

    

    =)

    

    Sarah

    

    

    On 5/17/2011 8:17 AM, Deanna Zandt wrote:
    
      

      
      I'd also be interested in contributing-- the BLP experience of
      last week was incredibly enlightening, and got me thinking about
      access... having the right key unlocked a wealth of knowledge and
      aid. How to make that key more widely available, or second
      nature/common knowledge? I'm hoping to blog about it soon. In any
      case, I'd like to come at some of the HOW-TO issues in general
      from that noob perspective.
      

      
      

      
      

      
      cheers
      dz
        
              
                  
                      
                          
                              
                                  
                                      
                                          
                                            
                                              
                                                          

                                                          
                                                        
                                            
                                          
                                        
                                    
                                
                            
                        
                    
                
            
        
        

        
          On May 16, 2011, at 9:23 PM, Pete Forsyth wrote:
          

          On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:36 AM,
            Sarah Stierch <sarah at sarahstierch.com>
            wrote:

            
              
                
                   On 5/16/2011 11:49 AM, Pete Forsyth
                    wrote:

                    
                      Anybody interested in tackling this issue?
-Pete

                    
                  
                  I'm working on diving into the HOW-TO this summer for
                  Wiki. I do want to see all of these topics covered -
                  and I'll contribute in anyway I can. Where do we
                  start? ;-) 
              
              

              
              Hi Sarah,
              

              
              I'd be really happy to work on this with you! (And
                anyone else).
              

              
              My sense is that there's a lot of work to do in
                identifying the problem -- or rather, evaluating the
                collection of interrelated issues, and determining where
                it's best to focus. The things that seem significant to
                me are:
              

              
              (1) Picture of the Day on Commons often seems to be
                the source of unnecessary strife (moreso than, say, PotD
                on English Wikipedia);
              (2) It appears that there is not a clearly identified
                set of editorial values around what DOES constitute a
                worthwhile PotD on Commons;
              (3) The technical and social processes for setting a
                PotD are difficult to understand and poorly documented.
              

              
              How about if we collaborate a bit on documenting how
                things currently work? I think that process will point
                the way toward recommending a solution.
              

              
              I've set up a page for this project, if you're game! http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Peteforsyth/PotD
              

              
              -Pete
            
            _______________________________________________

            Gendergap mailing list

            Gendergap at lists.wikimedia.org

            https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

          
        
        

      
      
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap at lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

    
    

    

    -- 

      
       Wikipedia
            Regional Ambassador, The Nation's Capital

          Wikipedian-in-Residence,
            Archives of American Art

          --

        
       Sarah Stierch Consulting
       Historical, cultural &
            artistic research, advising & event planning.
       ------------------------------------------------------
       http://www.sarahstierch.com/
    
  


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap at lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/attachments/20110520/86ab173a/attachment.htm