This seems reasonable to me, though I'm a little wary of drawing the line so
firmly just in case there's a case I'm not thinking of where sexual image
would best illustrate something on a non-sexual page.
-Fluff
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Ryan Kaldari <rkaldari(a)wikimedia.org>wrote;wrote:
Yep, try
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:People_using_vacuum_cleaners
So do we all agree that the Principle of Least Astonishment needs to be
encoded into some kind of policy or guideline? In other words, images with a
sexual context should only appear in articles/categories that also have a
sexual context.
Ryan Kaldari