[Foundation-l] [Slashdot] Why the Photos On Wikipedia Are So Bad

[wiki-lists at phizz.demon.co.uk]

Ray Saintonge wrote:
> wiki-lists at phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
>> David Gerard wrote:
>>   
>>> Explaining this to professional content creators and media companies
>>> leads to exploding heads. Pointing out that giving it all away has
>>> made Wikipedia a top-ten website and must be doing all right from it
>>> isn't enough to convince them ... it goes so much against everything
>>> they think they know about the world.
>>>     >> And in turn there are those of us that will not give anything to these 
>> media companies. I'll see a company like News International rot in hell 
>> first.
>>   
> 
> 
> a properly viral licence will constrain the commercial 
> publisher with the requirement that any use by him will also render his 
> new context for that photograph just as available for free use as the 
> photograph itself.
> 

No it does not. The viral (SA) part of the CC license only applies to 
derivatives. It does not apply to collections, it does not apply if 
used to illustrate an article or advertising flier, ...