No subject

Wikipedia articles, they are often unhappy with their articles but
also either don't want to interfere in a community they aren't part
of, or don't want to be seen as complaining on their own behalf and
thus risk seeming vain.  Most often it's not that there is something
really wrong or negative, it's just that the article is so incomplete
or imbalanced that it gives a misleading impression of who they are
and what they do.  I'd go so far as to say that the significant
majority of BLPs for academics (at least) are not appreciated by their
subjects.

-Sage (User:Ragesoss)