[Foundation-l] Agreement between WMF and O'Reilly Media about Wikipedia: The Missing Manual on Wikipedia?

Chris Down neuro.wikipedia at googlemail.com
Thu Jan 29 20:54:32 UTC 2009


That page doesn't attribute the creator of the original image, either.

- Chris

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Robert Rohde <rarohde at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wikipedia-The_Missing_Manual_I_mediaobject_d1e29885.png
>
> -Robert Rohde
>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Mark (Markie)
> <newsmarkie at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > i must admit i havent looked closely, but could you give us an example of
> an
> > image where the watermark can be clearly seen and is an issue?
> >
> > regards
> >
> > mark
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Chris Down
> > <neuro.wikipedia at googlemail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Well, either way, there's no harm in asking him to upload ones without
> the
> >> watermark.
> >>
> >> - Chris
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Gerard Meijssen
> >> <gerard.meijssen at gmail.com>wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hoi,
> >> > As far as I know, Commons has no such thing on watermarking. As
> always,
> >> > come
> >> > up with better illustrations and you can replace them. This is an
> >> > extraordinary situation anyway... Wikipedia has also this other "rule;
> >> > Ignore all rules.. A good one to apply for now.
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >     GerardM
> >> >
> >> > 2009/1/29 Chris Down <neuro.wikipedia at googlemail.com>
> >> >
> >> > > As a note, the images are watermarked, and I have notified the user.
> >> IUP
> >> > > states that this should not occur.
> >> > >
> >> > > - Chris
> >> > >
> >> > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Thomas Dalton <
> >> thomas.dalton at gmail.com
> >> > > >wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > 2009/1/28 Andrew Whitworth <wknight8111 at gmail.com>:
> >> > > > > Wikipedia would have to write some kind of
> >> > > > > special exception to every rule to allow this book to exist
> there.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > We already have the only exception we need: IAR. (That doesn't
> means
> >> > > > Wikibooks wouldn't handle it better, though!)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > > foundation-l mailing list
> >> > > > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> >> > > > Unsubscribe:
> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >> > > >
> >> > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > foundation-l mailing list
> >> > > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> >> > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >> > >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > foundation-l mailing list
> >> > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> >> > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> foundation-l mailing list
> >> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>


More information about the foundation-l mailing list