[Foundation-l] The end of donations

[David Goodman]

I'm pleased to accept the epithet.  Pro-freedom dogmatist describes me
nicely with respect to many areas of life, including  both sexuality
and access to information. I think it comes close to describing most
of the people at Wikipedia in matters of personal life and of
information.
Those who support censorship are obviously not going to be our sources
of funding.

David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG



On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:20 PM, stevertigo<stvrtg at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Matthew Brown<morven at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> As opposed to you, who'd just love to destroy that content to get money?
>
> Destroy what content? Recall I used the terms "fetish" and other
> destructive-sexuality / pro-depravity articles and images" and
> referred to people who support their ubiquitous access as "pro-freedom
> dogmatists." Granted there are light, grey, and also black areas
> within the overall realm of what might loosely be called "sexuality,"
> and we need to deal with most of them, but thats not to say we need to
> deal with every destroyed se
> x attached concept as if it were a ubiquitous part of any loving
> relationship. Wikipedia is censored after all. The question then is
> about scale and degree.
>
> -Stevertigo
>