[Foundation-l] A Wikimania for everyone?

[Michael Snow]

Every Wikimania bid has strengths and weaknesses. Once a bid is chosen, 
the ritual of criticizing the selection by focusing on some weakness 
seems to have become inevitable. I would be more impressed to reconsider 
the jury's selection if somebody presented a serious evaluation that 
reached a different result after weighing all the issues, instead of 
harping on only the one most favorable to the argument.

Since that is not yet forthcoming, I'd like to refocus the discussion on 
the concept of Wikimania in general, since it seems to produce so much 
debate. As an idea, Wikimania is being pulled in too many directions, 
and it cannot be all things to all people. Supposing we have a consensus 
that in the most basic sense it's a good idea (do we have that?), what 
can we make of this idea? What kind of event should it be? What values 
do we prioritize - intimacy, mass appeal, accessibility, outreach, 
infrastructure, culture? Others that I haven't listed? If we care about 
diversity, what is that? When we consider costs, whose costs do we mean? 
How do we balance the competing considerations?

Currently the conference is planned for roughly 400 people. So far I'm 
not aware of any location having difficulty attracting attendees. The 
argument for catering to the highest concentrations of contributors 
would be more appealing if coupled with the idea that it makes sense to 
accommodate more people. But expanding Wikimania would change other 
dynamics of accessibility - the type of facility used, individual costs 
and overall conference expenses, the character of the event. At least so 
far, nobody has been presenting this as a vision for Wikimania's future.

Another consideration is that admission fees have consciously been kept 
low. Otherwise Wikimania doesn't make Wikimedia contributors a priority 
- at least, not the kind of contributors I gather everyone is referring 
to here. For any location most people already face costs related to 
attendance, it's simply impossible to physically bring Wikimania to 
everyone. Realistically, for any one person, Wikimania may be close 
enough for you to come at minimal cost once or twice in your lifetime. 
Some people may have to use a broad interpretation of "minimal" for even 
that.

Geographic proximity only goes so far in any case. Talking about Europe 
and North America may sound as if that still leaves a vast range of 
options. In the first place, this would be more persuasive if we saw a 
larger number of cities bidding. When it's just one from each, the 
chances of producing a bid superior to a highly-motivated team from, 
say, South America are not exactly overwhelming. Furthermore, even if 
this was the very highest consideration, it's not exactly neutral 
between those. The varying population distributions and distances, 
especially for North America, would have obvious logical consequences. 
Basically, we should prefer any bid from the European core (defined by 
London on the west, Rome on the south, Berlin or Rome on the east, 
Berlin or Amsterdam on the north); the east coast of North America would 
be a secondary option (maybe we could disqualify Europe every third 
year); by comparison, the odds for the rest of North America would be 
decidedly inferior (after ten or so years, we might make it to Chicago 
or Los Angeles).

Wikimania could be bigger or smaller, reach the developing world or only 
the already-developed, more expensive or less so, rotated widely or 
narrowly. Leaving aside the security concerns specific to Alexandria, 
the choice of options would have the following undesirable consequences, 
depending on which course is taken:
*Complaints that the event is impersonal, lacks a sense of community, or 
is merely a stage-managed public relations show
*After a cycle or two, it seems to be pretty much just the same group of 
people getting together every few years
*Objections that the amount being spent is a poor use of foundation 
funds (depending on how it works out, this would be about either the 
size of the event or the travel costs incurred by the foundation itself, 
making distance from San Francisco a factor)
*Inability to accommodate anyone beyond the local audience, thus being 
hardly different from a random meetup and failing to reflect the diverse 
character of Wikimedia participants
*Rumors and misperceptions of unfairness in timing of when registration 
is opened or how tickets are allocated
*Outrage over high admission charges, resembling more closely a 
"professional" conference

I would like to understand what vision people have for Wikimania, and 
see how their vision would deal with all of these issues. So far I have 
heard only complaints and rebuttals, nobody offering their own vision 
(on this list, at least). I fear an end result of the fights over this 
would be to either abandon the idea of Wikimania, or simply to hold it 
in the Moscone Center every year like Macworld. Before we get there, 
let's hear some better alternatives.

--Michael Snow