[Foundation-l] Meta-arbcom (was: the foundations of...)

Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton at gmail.com
Sat Jan 5 16:14:20 UTC 2008


On 05/01/2008, hillgentleman <hillgentleman.wikiversity at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thomas Dalton,
>
> > The arguments from the parties, yes. I'm talking about discussion
> > within the committee. Once they've heard the arguments they need to
> > deliberate and reach a conclusion - that deliberation needs to happen
> > in one language or it's simply impractical.
>
>   Then I might have misread your comment.  Yes, that would be useful.
> That is up to the arbitrators and it is not something that we should bother
> ourselves with.

It needs to be decided before the committee is chosen, otherwise you
run of the risk of someone that doesn't speak English getting on the
committee but then not being able to take part in deliberations
because they are all in English.



More information about the foundation-l mailing list