No subject


Tue Nov 27 09:44:25 UTC 2007


license in order to further the copyleft agenda and deal with emerging legal
and technical challenges.

While I agree that there could be serious problems if a future license
deviates in significant ways from the current one, I don't think the current
intent is a nefarious one.  Rather they are looking to continue to advance
the overall movement in a way that is "consistent with the spirit" of the
current license.

Are you objecting in general about the concept of any possible change to the
license or is there some specific about this change that you are worrying
about?

-Robert Rohde

On Dec 13, 2007 3:46 PM, John at Darkstar <vacuum at jeb.no> wrote:

> Can you please explain what you try to say with "I would like to know
> why you are being so persistent"? Am I not allowed to make my own
> opinion? I think I have a reputation to say whatever I think is right
> without abiding to what you or anyone else think is right.
>
> I believe this license change is wrong, because it will break the
> contract with the contributors.
>
> John E Blad
> User:jeblad
>
> Andrew Whitworth skrev:
>  > On Dec 13, 2007 4:24 PM, John at Darkstar <vacuum at jeb.no> wrote:
> >> I think everyone knows that they can. The question is wetter Wikimedia
> >> should "request" a change tailored to break a contract with the
> >> contributors.
> >
> > Your insistence in stating that our request is anything negative, or
> > that somehow it's going to create a break in the contract, or will
> > result in some sort of "nightmare" situation is completely unfounded.
> > I would like to know why you are being so persistent in asserting that
> > the WMF or the FSF is doing something wrong, or illegal, or immoral,
> > or whatever. It simply isn't "bad" in the way you seem to think it is.
> >
> >> I for one find this extremely disturbing, and then going from a less
> >> than optimum license to one even worse? And it ain't even april yet?
> >
> > Why do you find it so disturbing? I'm thinking that perhaps you must
> > be a little misinformed.
> >
> > --Andrew Whitworth
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>


More information about the foundation-l mailing list