[Foundation-l] About transparency
daniwo59 at aol.com
daniwo59 at aol.com
Sun Dec 30 12:55:56 UTC 2007
In a message dated 12/30/2007 7:36:31 AM Eastern Standard Time,
wikimail at inbox.org writes:
On Dec 30, 2007 7:33 AM, <daniwo59 at aol.com> wrote:
> And you did not reject it because of your previous commitment to a
six-month
> waiting period, which was voted on unanimously by the Board just 2 and a
> half weeks earlier. (Kat voted for six months for Board-->Staff, but seems
to
> have rejected Staff-->Board).
>
It wasn't voted on, as a resolution wasn't yet drafted. "Resolutions
to be drafted post-meeting on BoardWiki by Erik. [After consultation
with Mike Godwin, will be drafted as a Bylaws revision.]"
That is exactly what I find worrying. Erik was charged with drafting the
resolution, yet his delay in doing so seemingly accrued him financial benefit as
paid staff. Since that is obviously not the case, I am simply trying to
clarify the timeline here.
I am also curious as to when Florence, as Chair, was approached by Sue
regarding Erik's appointment. Since Sue was effectively removing one of the Board
members charged with her oversight, it would have behoved her to obtain
Florence's approval before approaching Erik.
Danny
**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list