[Foundation-l] Good example; The works of Charles Darwin freed :)

[geni]

On 10/21/06, Ray Saintonge <saintonge at telus.net> wrote:
> Thanks.  I wonder how much of it is enforceable.  Of course it only
> relates to film and videos.  It does not appear to cover text or still
> photographs.
>

The lisence for those is pretty much identical I just can'r find it on the web.

> For specific observations: the Museum copyrights in 3.1 would not
> operate to restore copyrights that had already expired.

Under UK law that may not be the case

>  Section 3.6
> assigning one's own copyrights to the IWM seems to be way over the top.
>

Considering how much you have to pay to get your hands on the material yes.

-- 
geni