On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Jared Zimmerman <
jared.zimmerman(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
I'd like to propose we go with "*N*eutral,
*P*rogressive, *D*estructive,
and *C*onstructive" for the actual names in code.
I've heard a bit about this before, but I'm still confused about why there
need to be different Progressive and Constructive button types.
I think as far as users are concerned, there are only essentially two kinds
of buttons they look for: Yes or No. (e.g. Confirm or Cancel, Save or
Discard, and so on). We definitely need a neutral button type for "third
options" like Preview or Review changes. But two types representing
positive response and moving forward? Seems like we're maybe
overcomplicating things.
--
Steven Walling,
Product Manager
https://wikimediafoundation.org/