Hoi,<br>I really think that you should learn a bit more about trademarks. Your assume that it is acceptable for graphics that identify an organisation or a project to be used by everyone. This is not the case. <br>Thanks,<br>
GerardM<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/6/5 Abigor <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:abigor@forgotten-beauty.com">abigor@forgotten-beauty.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hello,<br>
<br>
This is maybe a kind of other point of view.<br>
<br>
I believe that the mission for the chaptors is to support free media.. But<br>
with keeping logo's protected under all right reserved that aren't giving<br>
a good example.<br>
<br>
I can understand that the official Wikimedia logos aren't free. But a logo<br>
for pikiwiki for example can easy be released under cc-by or cc-by-sa and<br>
that would also give a example for other company's how they should license<br>
there logo's and photo's.<br>
<br>
cc license can be used on Commons without problems.. But how can a<br>
organisation support free media and upload there own material under a non<br>
free license..<br>
<br>
Huib<br>
<br>
<a href="Http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/user:Abigor" target="_blank">Http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/user:Abigor</a><br>
msn: <a href="mailto:Abigor@forgotten-beauty.com">Abigor@forgotten-beauty.com</a><br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Commons-l mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org">Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l" target="_blank">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>