<div dir="ltr">I have been debating writing this response for the last several hours... <br><br>I'm sorry Szedki, but you need to go back and read [[COM:SCOPE]]. The first line reads: "Wikimedia Commons is a freely licensed <b>media file repository</b> (similar to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stock_photography" class="extiw" title="w:Stock photography">stock photography</a> archives) targeted at other Wikimedia projects."<br>
<br>What this means in plain English to us? That if an image is used by ANY PROJECT for a VALID PURPOSE (in this case on en.wp for [[w:Semen]] ) - it is IN SCOPE.<br><br>Just in case we're a little fuzzy here? What is a valid purpose... well, anything other than an attack image. Sometimes images get uploaded and deleted shortly there after as being an attack image. In the case of [[<a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Semen2.jpg" title="Image:Semen2.jpg" target="_blank">Image:Semen2.jpg</a>]] the image was added to [[w:Semen]] on <b><a title="" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Semen&oldid=71370118">12:47, 23 August 2006</a> </b>. (Yes, I went back through a few thousand version to find where it got added).<br>
<br>The rest of our scope page goes out the window at this point in time. I don't care if you hate cumshots, I don't care if it is against your god/country/religion. This is COMMONS, it is for EVERYONE not just myself or yourself. Oh, and in case it helps: The word "Common" is defined as: Mutual; shared by more than one. [ <a href="http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Common">http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Common</a> ] . Oh, and for the record, I don't much like the cumshot pictures either. I don't think you'll find too many people that do.<br>
<br>----<br><br>As for the rest of your email, I don't think I claimed to have any relation to you - ANYWHERE. Be it father, brother, uncle, archnemisis, priest, etc. If I did, feel free to let me know.<br><br>As yes, I am tired of this argument. But when I'm tired and angry at people, I go out for a bike ride... not delete images. I felt the need to use strong language on my talk page to convey my point... not everyone may appreciate it - but I was not directing it anyone. Additionally, I think I properly prefaced my comment so anyone with sensitive ears (or in this case eyes) would be upset.<br>
<br>-Jon<br>[[Commons:User:ShakataGaNai]]<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 6:00 PM, szwedzki <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:suidisz@gmail.com">suidisz@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:36:53 -0700<br>
Jon <<a href="mailto:wiki@konsoletek.com">wiki@konsoletek.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Ok.... So why don't I pop in and explain my thoughts and therefor my<br>
> actions. As I've said about 100 times, I'll happily explain anything I do.<br>
<br>
</div>[...]<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
> but as the original user pointed out to me - this file was<br>
> in use<br>
<br>
</div>It's not an argument, images "in use" (!). Images "in use" were often<br>
uploaded and linked on other wikis by the same user.<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
> Yes, the UDEL was completed extremly<br>
> quickly - but the image was (again) previously in use and no outstanding<br>
> issues other than people didn't like the content<br>
<br>
</div>Three opinions pro undeletion and one strong oppose, completely ignored<br>
by Rocket000, decision after 20 hours. Extremely or curious?<br>
<br>
[...]<br>
<br>
<a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ShakataGaNai#A_block_on_User:Szwedzki" target="_blank">http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ShakataGaNai#A_block_on_User:Szwedzki</a><br>
<br>
Sweet. You're not my teacher and you're not my father or buddhist<br>
master. The answer is simple:<br>
<br>
Step 3 - Is it in Scope? You say YES, I say NO.<br>
<br>
Rest of your answer to Wpedzich is bitter sweet - i could ask you - "you<br>
were having a bad day or simple were going rogue?". You're tired? It's<br>
not my problem.<br>
<br>
My proposition is still: unblock and start a debate 'bout Richiex<br>
images and few other amateur photos from "anatomy" categories.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
szwedzki<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Commons-l mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org">Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l" target="_blank">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>