<div>It said "if it works, don't try to fix it", and as I found out - if you DO want to fix it, make a copy and then do your tests...</div>
<div>Yuval<br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/24/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Florian Straub</b> <<a href="mailto:flominator@gmx.net">flominator@gmx.net</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Hi there,<br><br>I just changed <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Flickr">http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Flickr
</a> to now use<br>{{information}}. Unfortunately there are some files, where reviewer is not<br>filled it at "reviewer" in {{flickr}} but by using {{flickrreview}}. This<br>causes two templates to show up, which are semantically wrong. See
<br><a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Ketchikan1.jpg&oldid=3685514">http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Ketchikan1.jpg&oldid=3685514</a><br>for example.<br><br>Maybe that would give us the change to occasionally "subst" it in order to
<br>receive a "normal" description page:<br><a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image%3AKetchikan1.jpg&diff=7202414&oldid=3685514">http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image%3AKetchikan1.jpg&diff=7202414&oldid=3685514
</a><br><br>Otherwise machine reading could rescursively read the templates and get the<br>information from the fields as well.<br><br>Comments? Criticism?<br><br>Regards,<br><br>Flo<br><br>PS: In my opinion we should simply delete it and replace it by
<br>{{information}}<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Commons-l mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org">Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l">
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l</a><br></blockquote></div><br>