2009/1/20 Howard Cheng <howard(a)howcheng.com>om>:
I don't see why. The faster the better IMHO.
Just in case an edit is not vandalism or at least not entirely. A new
user wanting to add a comment and accidentally blanking the page
should of course be reverted, but the comment should also be
implemented in the page. The bot couldn't do that, it would just
revert the edit.
Regards,
ChrisiPK
2009/1/20 Howard Cheng <howard(a)howcheng.com>om>:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:51 AM, ChrisiPK <chrisipk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Well, if we are to activate a bot, I would like to see a proper
>> waiting time before suspected vandalism is reverted. An hour or so
>> would be nice. That leaves people enough time to act, which is always
>> better than just an automated bot reverting everything.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> ChrisiPK
>>
>
I don't see why. The faster the better IMHO.
>
> -h
>
> _______________________________________________
> Commons-l mailing list
> Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
>
>