On 11/02/2008, Bryan Tong Minh <bryan.tongminh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
How about the Free Art License (FAL)?
<http://artlibre.org/licence/lal/en/>:
" All the elements of this work of art must remain free, which is why
you are not allowed to integrate the originals (originals and
subsequents) into another work which would not be subject to this
license."
I don't really understand... does this mean that you can't show FAL
work aside GFDL, or does it mean that derivative works are only
allowed under the FAL? Curiously, the FAL does also not contain an
aggregation clause.
Bryan
Darn I knew someone would spot that sooner or latter. I suspect you
are right. Furthermore I suspect that since the FAL lacks an update
clause there is nothing we can do other than blunt force deletion.
--
geni