On 7/14/07, Brianna Laugher <brianna.laugher(a)gmail.com> wrote:
No it's not. Commons doesn't approve every
acceptable license in the
world, only the ones that come across our desk. This one's
controversial. Just because Commons hasn't accepted it yet doesn't
mean we never will.
It's non free. I fails to see why there should be any change of position.
I think we should -- or else CC should release a 3.1
that the
naysayers will find acceptable -- because it's going to cause
increasing problems for Commons as the CC 3.0 licenses become more
widely adopted.
Minor problem compared to how widely NC and ND licenses are adopted.
--
geni