On 8/12/07, Matthew Brown <morven(a)gmail.com> wrote:
That such a change was implemented after only 21 people voted in favor
of it is frankly shocking. This is not a change in a guideline that
affects only a few people; it's a change in site-wide policy affecting
a great number of users. 314 people are listed as having admin tools
on commons. The farce of 21 users being considered "consensus" here
should be obvious.
-Matt
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
How is this new matthew? Commons adminship has been subject to removal
uppon long inactivity. I recall it being so when I became admin, so
I'm wondering why so much fuss now