[Commons-l] justifying the "no NC/ND" requirement

Andre Engels andreengels at gmail.com
Mon Apr 3 13:21:58 UTC 2006


2006/4/3, Brianna Laugher <brianna.laugher at gmail.com>:

> So... anyone have a killer response that will instantly make a user
> see why this requirement is necessary?

NC and ND are clearly incompatible with GNU/FDL. CC-BY-SA on the other
hand is incompatible on a technical level only. That is, the rules
specify that one cannot cross-license, but the spirit of both licenses
is equal. Allowing CC-BY-SA is only a small step from requiring
everything to be GNU/FDL. Allowing NC or ND is a much larger step, and
we could not reasonably consider an article as a whole to be GFDL if
there are such images in it.

--
Andre Engels, andreengels at gmail.com
ICQ: 6260644  --  Skype: a_engels


More information about the Commons-l mailing list