<div dir="ltr">All these are good examples. I would also like to add some:<div><br></div><div>- rules for free use of images of copyrighted product packaging (free use of book/CD/DVD covers, etc might be included here or separate)<br>
</div><div>- some kind of clear rules for to what extent one has to rework a work to create a new, derivative work (at which point do new, separate rights for derivative works rise? this would help a bit with museums and archives claiming copyright on photos etc of their contents, like The Israel Museum claiming copyright on their images of Dead Sea Scrolls or The Smithsonian Institute on some high-quality, digitally cleansed images)<br>
</div><div>- clear rules on what constitutes mass production and hence is not covered by copyright (mostly, this concerns product design and architecture)</div><div>- I'd very much like an international agreement to put things like money, postage stamps, etc entirely out of copyright</div>
<div>- some international agreement on more specific issues concerning countries with "interrupted history" (like the whole former Socialist block, but there are certainly many other examples): the status of works produced under occupation by state agencies, or by the juridical persons who ceased to exist (can author of an encyclopedia article published in 1939 claim any rights if all rights originally belonged to the publisher discontinued in 1940? which juridical persons can or can't claim to inherit the rights of such a publisher?)</div>
<div>- the terms for media channels could be shorter than for other kinds of works (most media outlets do not earn money from their editions published 30 years ago, but historical media is an important part of a society's public memory)</div>
<div><br></div><div>Raul</div><div>WMEE</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Luis Villa <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lvilla@wikimedia.org" target="_blank">lvilla@wikimedia.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">Hi, Bea!<br><br></div><div class="im"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 3:47 AM, Beatriz Busaniche <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bea@vialibre.org.ar" target="_blank">bea@vialibre.org.ar</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br>
In countries where we have no Freedom of Panorama, like Argentina and<br>
Uruguay, Copyright Reform is really needed for projects like Commons.</blockquote></div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra">What else would be on our copyright reform wishlist? Maybe putting together a list of such things would make for a good meta page? I can think offhand of:<br>
<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">- FOP<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">- orphan works reform (if done correctly, could be useful for Wikibooks)<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">- term reform/limitation (i.e., fighting the next wave of term extensions)<br>
- standardized limitations and exceptions: <a href="http://infojustice.org/flexible-use" target="_blank">http://infojustice.org/flexible-use</a> (possibly this approach is too vague to be useful for us)<br clear="all"></div>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">I think Dimi had a list somewhere too?<br></div><div class="im"><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Luis<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr">
Luis Villa<br>
Deputy General Counsel<br>Wikimedia Foundation<br><a href="tel:415.839.6885%20ext.%206810" value="+14158396885" target="_blank">415.839.6885 ext. 6810</a><br><div><a value="+14158820495"></a><br><div><span style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:Tahoma"><font style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="1">NOTICE: </font></span><font style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="1"><i>This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by accident, please delete it
and let us know about the mistake. As an attorney for
the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve
as a lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal<b> </b>capacity.</i></font></div></div></div>
</div></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Advocacy_Advisors mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org">Advocacy_Advisors@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors" target="_blank">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy_advisors</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>