Having similar colours is quite a distinct from having a logo similar in
overall appearance. Since there has already been a comment on the
colours, I don't think the request to have a similar comment on
appearance is unreasonable.
In fact it is probably necessary for completeness, and to save lines of
discussion on something that may not be an issue.
This does affect Meta too, and the other projects that reference it.
Ian.
On 08/11/12 04:01, Snowolf wrote:
So you feel a logo you don't like shouldn't
become the logo and so
raise it here? Please...
I'm sure Philippe is watching the discussion and has already commented
that for example the whole idea about the colors not being used is not
a concern or a problem on WMF's part.
Snowolf
On 07/11/2012 17:53, Powers wrote:
The Wikivoyage logo poll is generating strong support for an option
that looks extremely similar to the Meta-Wiki logo. Several of us
feel that this will create brand confusion and numerous problems down
the road, but it still has strong support from folks who think that
similarity -- which in this case goes far beyond just the colors --
is an asset. Is there any way we can get WMF's brand identity team
(or whomever) to comment on whether such a logo would be acceptable,
ideally before we get into stage 2 of the poll?
Powers &8^]
_______________________________________________
Wikivoyage-l mailing list
Wikivoyage-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikivoyage-l