> Yes, and
doesn't it mean chaning the policy of
meta-wiki?
Hmm, it seems everything is on topic, including
software
developement
and administration :-)
I meant if I deleted contents that are personal and
not
related to development and administration, doesn't
it mean I
am against the policy of meta-wiki, which says
everything is
acceptable as the name meta implies?
I guess we don't need
dev.wikipedia.org but
for
things people don't dare to delete completely
from
wikipedia. Be bolder!
Again, if meat becomes anything but trashcan I would
love to
contribute to meta. But can we do that without the
agreement? Actually, I am not only talking to Kurl
but just
asking anyone who objects to clean up
meta-wikipedia.
I object.
These pages do not disturb anyone but you. As long as
Jimbo has room on his server, what would you remove
pages that *you* think are personals ? Why does it
disturb you so much that we are offered a tiny
personal space ?
I don't think the encyclopedic wikis it is the right
place really to put pov stuff on, for these are public
places. There are no limits to povs, and I don't think
proper that these pov positions coexist with
supposingly neutral articles. For readers could find
them pretty easily and wonder over them.
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.