Hi, is there a recommended work flow for bugfixing? Right now what I do is submit a patch to gerrit and, if I remember, set some tag in bugzilla. At some point somebody approves and merges the patch. Then, if I remember, I set the bug to resolved/fixed in bugzilla. There is a bit too much remembering involved for my taste. It's easy to forget to close the bug in bugzilla, especially if the patch has been lying around for some time before being merged. Would it be possible/sensible to automatically close a bug when the patch is merged? Or did I miss something?

Hi, is there a recommended work flow for bugfixing? Right now what I do is submit a patch to gerrit and, if I remember, set some tag in bugzilla. At some point somebody approves and merges the patch. Then, if I remember, I set the bug to resolved/fixed in bugzilla. There is a bit too much remembering involved for my taste. It's easy to forget to close the bug in bugzilla, especially if the patch has been lying around for some time before being merged. Would it be possible/sensible to automatically close a bug when the patch is merged? Or did I miss something? Cheers, Stephan

is there a recommended work flow for bugfixing?

Right now what I do is submit a patch to gerrit and, if I remember, set some tag in bugzilla. At some point somebody approves and merges the patch. Then, if I remember, I set the bug to resolved/fixed in bugzilla.

There is a bit too much remembering involved for my taste. It's easy to forget to close the bug in bugzilla, especially if the patch has been lying around for some time before being merged.

Would it be possible/sensible to automatically close a bug when the patch is merged? Or did I miss something?