But Sumana...
If this is integrated into the visual editor... Maybe it can serve as
something similar to "Inline cleanup templates"[1]. No?
[
On 04/12/2013 10:42 AM, Richa Jain wrote:
Hi, i have written a rough draft for my proposal
to outreach program and
gsoc and need your suggestions regarding this.
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Rjain/Gsoc-Prototyping-inline-comments.
Thank you.
Richa Jain, thanks for sending around this link! It would be great if
you could add more links to your user page so we can see the code you
wrote for "Experiences at IITR", the hubot script, and so on.
What is your aim for this project? Would you try to get it deployed
onto Wikimedia Foundation websites such as Wikipedia? Or is this meant
to be an extension that other "third-party" wikis, such as
http://practicalplants.org/ or
http://en.battlestarwiki.org/ or
http://wiki.blender.org/ , use instead of talk pages? I can tell you
that for an idea like this, the former is orders of magnitude more
difficult and probably impossible in the scope of a GSoC project (I am
not exaggerating). If, as your title implies, you really just want to
come up with a prototype, please clarify this in your proposal.
For a project like this, it seems to me that interaction design is
crucial, as is learning from the past experiences we've had regarding
discussion functionality in MediaWiki. For instance, what lessons have
you learned from looking at LiquidThreads, DiscussionThreading,
Comments, SemanticComments, ArticleComments, or Commentbox?
Just think of an article stating a debatable
fact. It would probably
attract people to make inline comments stating the fact
rather than using
the talk page.
I'm not quite sure what you are saying here; are you implying that it is
currently a problem that people are using talk pages to debate
particular passages or sentences within articles? I think we would
still have to have talk pages or similar functionality in order to allow
people to discuss the article as a whole, and so the design of any
additional functionality would have to ensure that the discussion didn't
fragment. So, I encourage you to gather and write a lot of user
stories, problem definitions, research, and so on in order to better
ensure your plan is doable and to ensure you're making something people
can use! The design list
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design would be helpful to
consult.
Hope this helps.
--
Sumana Harihareswara
Engineering Community Manager
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l