Thank you Brion & Kurt.
I read all post about the subject on wikipedia-l and founded this :
That's another thing to think about. BTW, I implemented page
fragment links (e.g., [[Chemistry#history]], which links to
[[##history]] on the Chemistry page), though I haven't made much
noise about it because I'm still not sure they're needed--for one
thing, they encourage long pages, and I don't like my syntax. But
headings do seem like a natural match there.
Does this system still alive ?
The french Wikipedians agree (in the majority) about the fact that too long
articles need to be slice in sub-articles, but perhaps we don't have the
same definition of what a TOO LONG article is.
For exemple, I don't think this article
http://fr.wikipedia.com/wiki.cgi?Pharaon is too long.
Instead, I think in this case, anchors sould be really a usefull feature.
The other case where we NEED achors, is for discussions.
For exemple our vote page (
http://fr.wikipedia.com/wiki.cgi?Wikipedia-Vote)
is a vote only page.
To make this page more readable, we moved discussion about the voting
subject on other pages.
We want to be able to target an exact place in this discussion pages.
I disagree the argument that implement anchors will encourage people to make
more long articles.
We have to trust people to be enough mature to understand the benefit of
having short articles.
Even if someone write too long article, it's really easy to cut it in small
part if you think it is necessary.
Do you think I had better to post this message on wikipedia-l ?
Cheers,
Guillaume (Aoineko)