Steve Bennett-4 wrote: I commend for your perusal the <blockquote> tag, which can be customised with CSS styles to your heart's content, and the {{quotation}} template: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Quotation There's a nice example here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy It needs a bit of tweaking (named parameters are better for various reasons, and in some places you don't actually need the attribution because it precedes the quotation) but it seems to fit your bill. HTH HAND -- Phil -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/add-a-border-%28in-CSS%29-in-order-to-emphasise-inden… Sent from the Wikipedia Developers forum at Nabble.com.

Steve> On 5/5/06, Phil Boswell Steve> &lt;phil.boswell(a)gmail.com&gt; Steve> wrote: Steve> Ok, yeah I know about that template, which I find for most Steve> practical purposes pretty impractical. Everytime I've tried Steve> to use it, either the source of the quotation was already Steve> obvious, or I wanted to surround it with ""s or Steve> something. In any case, it's a bit cumbersome for a talk Steve> page. If a template was the only solution, a very basic Steve> style would be my preference - none of this hard-coded Steve> quotation author bizzo... Not sure I understand completely. I can of course wrap my edits in a talk page, with a {{Quotation| You are right}}{{~~~~}} structure[1]. But as far as I can see, that cannot easily be indented! :{{Quotation| You are right}}{{~~~~}} does not work {{:Quotation| You are right}}{{~~~~}} does not work is a different thing. So I think for the moment being the CSS entry from the french wikipedia site seems the best solution. Uwe Brauer since I use Emacs as an editor, and have a wikipedia mode for it, it is very easy :)

On 5/8/06, Uwe Brauer &lt;oub(a)mat.ucm.es&gt; wrote: Personally I find the colours at Fr a bit garish, but in principle I support it. Steve