On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 22:16 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Ivo van der Wijk
<vladdrac(a)gmail.com> [2004.06.25.2024 +0200]:
Browsing source and css reveals:
Aha, I didn't actually think about scanning the source. Silly me.
Maybe the Wikipedia could attribute their layout and design more
prominently to Plone?
There's actually little left of the fundamental plone css setup- if you
compare the xhtml source of the page you'll see that we sport a real
content-first order while plone follows the easier route with ui
elements in the source where they appear on the page.
The main similarities are tab formatting (which is also very different
css-wise), the boxes in the left column, the header underline, the blue
li bullet and some icons.
--
Gabriel Wicke