> 2016-11-03 10:12 GMT+01:00 Andrea Zanni <zanni.andrea84@gmail.com>:
>
>> Thanks Mathieu.
>> What really strikes me is that challenge is doable in fr.wikisource: in
>> many others would be complete madness ;-)
>> Also, Polish Wikisource is doing great.
>>
>> What interest me is understanding how they are building their community
>> of
>> active and super-active proofreaders: are they doing something that
>> other
>> wikisource aren't?
>>
>
> Not sure if there is a link but when you mention fr.ws and pl.ws I can
> immediately think of a correlation since these two are among the rare
> wikisources which are prooferead system only (or nearly only : 92 % and 96
> % of mainspace pages back with scan, see
> http://tools.wmflabs.org/phetools/statistics.php).
>
> Cdlt, ~nicolas

In pl.ws we have a policy that if a text *can* be processed using
ProofreadPage (legal aspects, scan availability) then it *has to* be
processed using this extention.

Ankry

_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l