2010/7/22 Federico Leva (Nemo)
<nemowiki@gmail.com>
I think it isn't. "Linguistico" folks have done this
(http://linguistico.sourceforge.net/pages/start.html , their dictionary
is used by OpenOffice, Firefox etc.) and anyway a list of words is not
so useful for Wiktionary, what is needed are definitions.
Well, I understand that a "rough" list of words isn't so useful; but a list of words, anyone linked with a full bibliographic source pointing to the image and text of the original page, perhaps could be of some interest. No matter if it isn't.... simply, I'll not think about any more.
Alex
Alex