AubreyWS search tool was a step in the right direction, but it's a difficult job and it should be a community effort.IMHO, we should try to put all our descriptive metadata (author, title, etc.) there, with a good, meaningful structure (we should understand which metadata are from the ns0 page, which from the Index pages, they are often different). Then, we could build APIs or other tools on that.It's years (for me, an entire decade...) that we advocate and propose solutions for metadata workflow in Wikisource, and as far as I understand, a big part of it is Wikidata.but I think it's not the solution, as we already have such a tool and nobody uses it...Thanks for the reminder, just voted and commented.I supported also the OAI-PMH proposal,On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Sam Wilson <sam@samwilson.id.au> wrote:And don't forget to vote for your own proposals (otherwise your own support won't be counted in the tally).:-)The top three Wikisource proposals so far are:
Upload Wikisource text wizard 9 Support Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH) 7 Integrate the CIS-LMU Post Correction Tool 4 (Although, of course it's far to early to draw any conclusions from that.)On Tue, 29 Nov 2016, at 12:16 AM, David Cuenca Tudela wrote:Hi!The voting period has been opened. You can see the proposals for Wikisource and enter your votes here:Cheers,Micru_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l