Yes, I fully agree.
We should start on a small project where people are interested.
We can consider the bigger wikis later, once we are confident that we like it and it works the way we want.
I was citing Enwiki just to discuss potential performance.
Ian and I can help with advice etc anyone who wants to try this out.
Luca

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Andrew Whitworth <wknight8111@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:42 PM, mike.lifeguard
<mike.lifeguard@gmail.com> wrote:
>>even on the English Wikipedia (5 edits / second at most?) a single CPU
>> would suffice

But why start so large? Pick a smaller test wiki first like, say,
en.wikibooks? We can throw that into the queue of things we want
installed down at WB.

--Andrew Whitworth

_______________________________________________
Wikiquality-l mailing list
Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l