Witam,
potrzebuję pomocy z licencjami do fotografii. Nie bardzo znam się na
amerykańskich licencjach i nie za dobrze rozumiem co oni tam piszą.
Znalazłam stronę (jakich pewnie jest sporo) na której są m.in. zdjęcia
lotnicze z czasów II wojny światowej (m.in. fotografowali Polskę).
http://www.footnote.com/browse.php#All|47653680
Przykład: zdjęcie lotnicze Mielca
awers - http://www.footnote.com/image/47653680/
rewers - http://www.footnote.com/image/47653692/
Zdjęcia oznaczone są jako za FREE, ale w sensie, że to ogólnie płatny
serwis, a teraz mają jakąś promocję (do końca sierpnia) i można sporo rzeczy
ściągnąć bez wcześniejszego płacenia.
Pytanie - czy ściągnięte zdjęcia można później również za free opublikować ?
Czyli jaka jest ich faktycznie licencja ...
Może ktoś bardziej kumaty w angielskim by mógł na to look'nąć ? :-)
Beax
Ot, ciekawostka - jak zarobić na Wikipedii. Sprawdziłem jedną z ofert na brytyjskim Amazonie - tekst o Timorze Wschodnim żywcem zerżnięty z enwiki.
Picus viridis
> It was raised before on the Village Pump, but I think this is so disturbing
> that we ought to do something.
>
> "Alphascript Publishing" has published over 1900 (and counting) books, all
> available on Amazon. Prices range from $31 to $179. All of these books are
> simple computer-generated copies from Wikipedia and (at least according to
> one Amazon reviewer) couple other public domain websites. Trouble is, from
> book description page there is absolutely no way of knowing that the book is
> a Wikipedia mirror on paper. At least several Amazon buyers have been
> fooled. What really gets my blood boiling is that Amazon user "VDM Verlag
> Dr.Müller" (I think someone exposed him as 100% shareholder of the
> publishing co) goes on rating these products as "five star"....
>
> The publisher seems to observe the copyright (even includes full edit
> history) so legal action seems impossible. Someone already contacted Amazon,
> but they "are not responsible for the quality of books sold". In the
> meantime the number of such books grew from 900 in June to almost 2000 as of
> today... I think we should do something. At the very least publishing
> product reviews warning that what this is....
>
> See:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PrimeHunter/Alphascript_Publishing_sells_…
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(miscellaneous)/Archive…
> http://rufftoon.livejournal.com/59337.html
>
> Thanks,
> Renata
>
> P.S. on a happier note: half of Wikipedia editors now can claim to be
> "published authors".
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Philippe Beaudette <pbeaudette(a)wikimedia.org>
Date: 2009/8/12
Subject: [Wikinews-l] Election Results
To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>,
wikinews-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
The Wikimedia Foundation's Board Election Committee has concluded the
board selection process, and is pleased to announce that the
candidates ranked as follows:
Final ranking
1 Ting Chen (Wing)
2 Kat Walsh (mindspillage)
3 Samuel Klein (Sj)
4 Gerard Meijssen (GerardM)
5 Domas Mituzas (Midom)
6 Thomas Braun (Redlinux)
7 Jussi-Ville Heiskanen (Cimon Avaro)
8 Steve Smith (Sarcasticidealist)
9 Dan Rosenthal (Swatjester)
10 José Gustavo Góngora (Góngora)
11 Brady Brim-DeForest (Bradybd)
12 Lourie Pieterse (LouriePieterse)
13 Adam Koenigsberg (CastAStone)
14 Ralph Potdevin (Aruspice)
15 Beauford Anton Stenberg (B9 hummingbird hovering)
16 Gregory Kohs (Thekohser)
17 Kevin Riley O'Keeffe (KevinOKeeffe)
18 Relly Komaruzaman (Relly Komaruzaman)
A full pairwise defeats table will be posted shortly.
These names have been respectfully submitted to the Board, which has
moved to seat the top three candidates.
The Committee wishes to thank all those who submitted themselves as
candidates. It was a broad and diverse field this year. We also wish
to recognize the many volunteers that helped with this process. The
committee extends its gratitude and thanks to them
For the committee,
Philippe