tarquin wrote: The main concern I have about this is that if it is widely used by foot soldiers like we all are now, then these uneditable reviews might take the place of /Talk pages, with the difference that refactoring them becomes impossible (rather than merely a social risk). Uneditable anything is a major step away from the wiki "mutually assured destruction" that keeps things occassionally civil around here. :-) So we should be careful about that. I'm strongly inclined to say that we should just embrace the Casio effect for another year or so -- our progress has not stalled (right?) and in another few years, we'll be to a point where "most everything important" will have an article about it. At that time, either we can start working on new inventions, possibly mirroring new social customs, to attract "expert" help. OR, and this is a distinct possibility, we will be the provider of raw "90% good" content for competing major "distributions". Larry, or someone like him with an interest in getting University sponsorship and grant money, can gather our content and devise a way (possibly involving payments!) to attract these polishers. There's no current crisis in the wikipedia world, so changes _later_ are probably better than changes _sooner_. I think I'm echoing several other people in saying this. --Jimbo