"Andrew Gray" <shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote in
message news:f3fedb0d0705040954p70cca3b4sc796820cdee40882@mail.gmail.com...
On 04/05/07, Mark Clements
<gmane(a)kennel17.co.uk>
wrote:
> "Sabine Cretella"
<sabine_cretella(a)yahoo.it> wrote
in
> message news:463A4A52.20407@yahoo.it...
> > I repeat: each article, even of only one sentence can be of high value
> > for somebody searching for information ... don't exclude the small
ones,
> > please and stop counting numbers ... it will
help you a lot. We are
not
> > in competition - we are co-operating
projects, that's all there is to
it.
Having just been in the position of having to defend an article that was
voted "medium importance for WikiProject Russia" from deletion, I am in
total agreement with you. There are too many people following "process"
without using their brains...
As an aside, that classification (in general terms) should be taken
with a grain of salt - many people/projects, for various reasons, just
Don't Use the "low importance" classification in rating articles. So
"medium" may well mean "utterly trivial but not entirely
irrelevant"...
...and to me 'not entirely irrelevant' means worthy of inclusion.
- Mark Clements (HappyDog)