Manning Bartlett wrote:
The solution to 24 is probably the same as with
Cunctator - the
silent ignore and passive editing approach. Maveric has tried to
reason with 24 repeatedly, but when reason is clearly failing there is
nothing else to do but protect the project.
I think that what "worked" with Cunc was (a) responding to his
legitimate concerns and (b) reasoning with him to be nicer with his
complaints.
But, yeah, trying to focus multiple people's attention on making sure
he doesn't screw anything up in the meantime is probably a good idea.
However, entire articles which usurp recognised terms
for personal
dogma are not controversial at all - they have to go, and that's
that. Collectively it is our responsibility to get rid of them.
Yes. Or better, to fix them.
--Jimbo