(Brion Vibber <vibber(a)aludra.usc.edu>)u>):
On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Axel Boldt wrote:
I think the GFDL needs to be mentioned, and it
would also be nice to
show the stable URL
http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backus-Naur_Form
rather than the internal one given above.
Another issue is whether we should have a stable URL that goes to
_that particular_ revision. This is something people have requested for
purposes of citing Wikipedia articles in bibliographies, etc, where part
of the point is that people can check your citations to see if you quoted
or interpreted them accurately.
-- brion vibber (brion @
pobox.com)
I think we'll want static-looking URLs for citable revisions,
so I'd suggest:
http://www.wikipedia.org/cite/20021215024500/Backus-Naur_Form
which gets redirected to
.../oldrev.phtml?title=Backus-Naur_Form&time=20021215024500
That shouldn't be too hard to implement.
--
Lee Daniel Crocker <lee(a)piclab.com> <http://www.piclab.com/lee/>
"All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past,
are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified
for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC