kband(a)www.llamacom.com wrote:
Actually, to my knowledge LMS is just about the only
one who's
strongly anti-subpages in any form (look for the previous discussion
on this issue).
I don't agree with this at all.
If he's still the final arbiter of all Wikipedia
functionality, then this is a moot point. If, however, we're back to
policy by consensus, then it won't be too hard. But Mr. Wales needs to
tell us what the story is there.
Don't think of it as "Larry as final arbiter" on the one hand and
"policy by consensus" on the other hand. The right way to look at it
is that Larry is the final arbiter of what the consensus is. Since
agitators on all sides are likely to never concede that the consensus
is against them, we need to have a final stopping point.
That's Larry, or maybe me if the issue is something technically beyond the
scope of his knowledge, but so far, achieving technical consensus has been
pretty easy.
--Jimbo