Michael Snow
wrote:
Wikipedia could turn into a place where the content is largely a
tasteless, watery gruel because everyone is on pins and needles to
avoid provoking negative responses.
Well, that would make me very happy. This is an encyclopedia, after
all.
BrilliantProse, good writing, need not be controversial or
antagonizing at all. A well written article can be lively,
interesting, well-organized, etc., while at the same time in a very
encyclopedic fashion present the facts in a sufficiently neutral
manner that all sides to a dispute, if they are working in good faith,
can agree that it's a good presentation.
--Jimbo
I feel like my point is being misunderstood, or else taken out of
context. (However, no offense is taken, and no apology necessary.)