On Apr 17, 2012 1:18 PM, "Thomas Dalton" <thomas.dalton@gmail.com> wrote:

On 17 April 2012 13:13, Fae <faenwp@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 17 April 2012 13:05, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is there not a free/open source alternative for creative publishing?
>
> Stevie needs standard tools to do his job and if someone has a spare
> license they might donate in-kind, all the better.
>
> The output would be available in various open formats in line with our
> existing policies.
>
> Open source tools exist, but let's be pragmatic about the inherent
> cost of attempting to use them if they are not widely accepted in the
> sector.

I believe our existing policy is to use open source tools whenever
they exist and are fit-for-purpose. Just because they aren't the
industry standard shouldn't be a reason not to use them.

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org