On 14 February 2013 19:15, Theo10011 <de10011@gmail.com> wrote:

> Perhaps you didn't read the clarification where Achal did serve on their
> board till September of 2011, he does happen to still be a member of the
> registered society who is still consulted by CIS. Perhaps you can read again
> below and clarify what you are characterizing as "baked assertion on facts".

You didn't send that email in September of 2011 or prior to that. You
sent it in February of 2013 - when Achal no longer serves on the
board. Nor is he listed on the page Sunil referenced. And it's "half
baked". I do wish you'd be more careful in your reading.

If you read again, I questioned, denoted by a question mark - if achal *still* serves on their board and if there was still an association. I asked still, because I knew he did at one point and I don't follow either of them.

I asked Sunil directly instead of forming conjectures and basing accusations.

Quick to make assertions and slow to offer corrections. You truly are
a joy Theo.

What assertions? He *did* serve on their board, he just quit some time ago. I don't follow achal or CIS's internal structure.

You are getting awfully defensive here for achal, for asking a direct question if Achal was still on their board or not. The answer was, Yes, he was on our board but not any longer, though we do consult occasionally - Apparently, that is all baseless by your standards.

What correction should I offer for asking that question?

-Theo