On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Bishakha Datta
<bishakhadatta@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Theo10011
<de10011@gmail.com> wrote:
As for "the highs and lows, ups and downs, failures and successes", allow us to decide on the holistic view. I don't think someone involved in a project can have a holistic view, things like observer bias and subject-expectancy effect might interfere.
Who's us, Theo? And surely those involved in the project are allowed to have - and share - their own views, regardless of whether or not others agree with them?
They are, my comment was only to her point about a "holistic view". 'Us' apparently means the community, the rest of the people viewing and commenting here. I didn't object to her sharing her view, it was calling it holistic that I was commenting on.
As for starting "Wiki editing" you might want to start yourself. I suggest your userpage on Meta, which if I recall I told you to create a month ago.
Ooooh! Can we please cut out these sort of unconstructive, personal comments. They don't help anyone or anything.
I assure you this was not a personal comment. You might want to look at the Meta talk page for IEP here [1] where admins who first dealt with the issue played a game charades to find out who was actually in-charge of IEP. It has editors from enwp, trying to deduce who Nitika.t is
Here's a couple of quotes- "
from User:Nitika.t's October 6th comment at en:Wikipedia talk:India Education Program we assume that she holds some position in the project, but she never states what it is" and And "er... that's it. From what I've been able to gather on my own:"
She eventually identified herself but only on that page. Her userpage on Meta, is a single dot added by me[2] so it wouldn't be a red-link to new editors from enwp, and she can confirm that I did indeed tell her to create a userpage on Meta in person a month ago in the office.
Regards
Theo