Hi Nitika
All the consideration aside for the "Brilliant army". I clicked on a couple of articles on your list, and then found an interesting pattern. Did you check any of these yourself? In case you didn't, I updated the list for you.
Most of the articles that don't have a comment in the list below are not sufficiently reviewed by other editors, very few received extensive copy editing for style and cohesiveness by regular editors, most still didn't. Most of them seem to be poorly written or formatted, a lot of these will be tagged several times for a multitude of issues, this is far from efficient, but I suppose their effort counts, only if these were created without a requirement to fill some course criteria. To which my question, what was the intent of the program again? This would have been the eventual outcome if 10 students voluntarily participated in a workshop and did those in their free time.
As for "the highs and lows, ups and downs, failures and successes", allow us to decide on the holistic view. I don't think someone involved in a project can have a holistic view, things like observer bias and subject-expectancy effect might interfere.
As for starting "Wiki editing" you might want to start yourself. I suggest your userpage on Meta, which if I recall I told you to create a month ago.
Regards
Theo
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Nitika <ntandon@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Partial equilibrium -Reverted thrice for copyvio, not sure if the current version is sufficiently verified.