Its not just about stubs. <br><br>We have users in Tamil Wikipedia who bulk upload 100s of complete articles they wrote offline with just one edit per article. One great article can be uploaded in one click and one mediocre article can have 100s of edits. <br>
<br>According to <br><br><a href="http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias">http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias</a><br><br><b>&quot;Depths above 300 for <a href="http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias#Notes" title="List of Wikipedias">Wikipedias</a> below 100 000 articles have been automatically dismissed as irrelevant.&quot;<br>
</b><br><div class="gmail_quote">When we focus on number of articles, some end up creating useless stubs. The same should not happen when we focus on edit counts. <br><br>Ravi<br><br><br>On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:18 AM, CherianTinu Abraham <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:tinucherian@gmail.com">tinucherian@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">What probably Arjuna meant was that, some of Wikipedias are more welcoming to the creation of stub articles. I am not saying that Malayalam Wikipedia doesn&#39;t though... <div>
<br></div><div>-Tinu Cherian <div><div></div><div class="h5"><br><br></div></div></div></blockquote><br></div><br>