By the way, has Batzel v. Smith been overturned? If so, maybe I'll
reconsider. If not, bring it on. Maybe I can even get the EFF to defend
me.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
2009/8/25 Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org>rg>:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com
wrote:
2009/8/25 Gregory Kohs
<thekohser(a)gmail.com>om>:
> I said a few things that brought the Foundation into a light of
disrepute.
> Is that the problem?
If you said anything that could be libellous then that could be a
problem. Whoever did the publishing would be liable.
I'll do the publishing, if that's the problem. I'm in the United
States, so
I'm protected by Section 230 of the CDA.
I suggest you run that by a lawyer, my understanding of the CDA is
that is isn't that broad.
Nah, I promise, I'll publish it. I've read enough case law to be confident
that I couldn't be successfully sued for publishing that audio recording. I
also trust Greg not to engage in slander, frankly. And I'm pretty much
judgement-proof anyway.
"No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as
the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information
content provider."
I'm a user of an interactive computer service, and the information was
provided by another information content provider.