Michael Maggs writes:
Could I just check, please, whether you were just
replying to an
out-of-the-blue email from Klaus or whether you have replied after a
review of
[[Commons:Deletion requests/National Portrait Gallery images (first
set)]] where your email has now been publicly quoted.
Are these my only two choices?
I'm aware, generally, of the ongoing discussion in Commons and
elsewhere about about how to respond to the National Portrait
Gallery's efforts to assert copyright interests in works that are
otherwise public domain. I don't normally "review" such discussions
(if you consider the volume of policy discussions on the projects
generally, you can see why).
The policy we at Commons have been working to is that
images must be
free in both the US and in the source country. I assume that is still
the WMF general position?
I'm not sure I understand the question, at least the way it's framed
here. WMF doesn't administer Commons policy to any great degree --
that's done by the community members at Commons.
If it's official WMF policy that Bridgeman is
assumed to apply in all
countries....
I'm not trying to say this, or even to tell the Commons community how
to apply Bridgeman at all. What I'm saying is that there seems to be
an effort to address a problem that, for the Foundation at least,
hasn't yet been shown to exist. (Believe me, I'd know it if we were
getting lots of takedown notices or copyright lawsuits from the
National Portrait Gallery.)
My strong belief is that there is no compelling reason to remove the
National Portrait Gallery-associated images unless there's some kind
of evidence of a legal problem for the Foundation. Thus far, there has
not been such evidence.
--Mike