On 10-jun-2006, at 2:44, oscar wrote:
3. the task of an appointed board should be
supervising the work of
the
executives, it should be a type of board consisting of very
professional
people (the kind which in a way of speaking should have "better
things to
do", if you get my meaning)
I'm sorry, but I don't.
Plus I don't understand why "this whole organization, its projects
and mission, its vitality and appeal", would collapse if the
separation "between volunteer-work, executive tasks and their
respective supervision" would not be implemented as strict as you
would like it to be.
, and in general not deal with the projects at
all.
4. the council of representatives should supervise the projects,
advise the
executive level, and in general not deal with the board at all.
Again I don't understand why such a strict separation should be
necessary.
i could be more elaborate in explaining the rationale
behind these
thoughts,
I think that would be a good idea.
So far all you have come up with was "I want a strict separation".
You can't convince people if you don't make clear why such a strict
separation should be necessary in the first place.
but i chose to keep things concise. note however, that
i spoke of how
specific tasks, responsibilities and work can be organized,
You mean *should* be organized, in order to prevent a total collapse,
right?
("the only way this organization (...) will survive").
IMHO rather strong words and little explanation, Oscar.
Erik vdMb aka Muijz