- Essjay - schrieb: This is probably what Cunctator had in mind when he wrote that the CVU is not a good idea. --elian

This isn't the fault of the CVU existing, it's a problem with having derivative logos (an idea which I've changed my mind on, hence why I deleted so many of the ones I created from Commons, and why I'd like to see an order from the Foundation to delete the rest of them). There isn't a problem with a bunch of vandals having a "Wikipedia Vandalism Unit;" if there was, we would have already gone after Daniel Brandt and the trolls at Wikipedia Review. What is the problem is the use of our logo, which should be dealt with quickly. I'll take this opportunity to remind individuals that the CVU does a lot of good work that nobody else seems to want to do, and takes a lot of hell for it with very, *very* little appreciation ever shown. Perhaps this time, instead of starting up on three choruses of "the CVU is evil," people could take the time to go drop a note on a CVU member's talk page that says "Hey, I noticed you hard at work reverting vandals, good work!" Now,.back to my vacation. Essjay On 2/23/06, The Cunctator <cunctator(a)gmail.com> wrote: -- Essjay ----- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Essjay Wikipedia:The Free Encyclopedia http://www.wikipedia.org/